Minnesota Workers' Compensation (WC) Adjuster Practice exam

Question: 1 / 400

Under which situation can an employer refuse to provide WC coverage?

When the injury occurred while the employee was on break

When the injury resulted from willful and serious misconduct of the employee

An employer can refuse to provide workers' compensation coverage when the injury resulted from the willful and serious misconduct of the employee. This principle is rooted in the understanding that workers' compensation is intended to provide benefits for injuries that occur as a result of the employee's work activities, and when the injury is the direct result of the employee's intentional or reckless actions, it undermines the purpose of the workers' compensation system.

In cases of willful misconduct, the employee has acted in a manner that is not just negligent but intentionally harmful or reckless, creating a situation where the employer should not be held liable for the consequences of those actions. This exception is designed to encourage safe and responsible behavior in the workplace and acknowledge that there are limits to the employer's liability under workers' compensation.

The other scenarios do not typically exempt employers from providing coverage. For instance, injuries that occur during breaks or while employees are following safety protocols are generally still covered, as these situations do not fall under willful misconduct. Equipment failure, unless it's directly tied to an employee's misconduct, is also not a valid reason for denying coverage.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

When the employee was following safety protocols

When the injury is due to equipment failure

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy