Which of the following individuals is most likely to have a valid Workers' Compensation claim?

The choice involving the employee injured while performing an operation for which he had not received training is the most likely to have a valid Workers' Compensation claim for several reasons. Workers' Compensation laws are designed to protect employees who are injured in the course of their employment. If an employee is tasked with an operation they have not been trained to perform, it raises significant questions about the employer's duty to ensure that employees are properly trained and equipped to handle their job responsibilities safely.

This circumstance illustrates a potential breach of the employer's obligation to provide a safe work environment, which includes supplying adequate training. If the injury resulted from a lack of training on a specific task, the employee may have a stronger claim, as it demonstrates that the employer may not have taken the necessary steps to prepare its employees for the tasks they are expected to perform.

In contrast, the other scenarios depict circumstances less likely to result in valid claims. A retiree injured while visiting a former workplace is typically not covered under Workers' Compensation because they are no longer employed. An employee suffering a diabetic coma due to non-compliance with prescribed medication would be categorized as a personal medical issue rather than a work-related injury, and injuries from ignoring safety rules generally limit compensation claims because they imply a degree of