Which statement about workers' compensation laws is correct?

The benefits provided under the workers' compensation law being typically the exclusive remedy for injured employees is a fundamental principle of workers' compensation systems across the United States. This exclusivity means that employees who are injured on the job cannot sue their employer for additional damages beyond what is provided in the workers' compensation benefits. This framework is designed to streamline the process for injured workers, ensuring they receive medical care and compensation for lost wages without the need for lengthy litigation, which can be burdensome and risky for both employees and employers.

The concept underscores the trade-off inherent in the system: while employees give up the right to pursue common law claims against their employer for work-related injuries, they gain access to a no-fault system that provides timely benefits. This system is particularly important because it protects both parties; it guarantees that employees receive compensation while limiting the potential financial liability for employers.

In contrast, the other statements presented do not reflect the nature of workers' compensation laws accurately. The scope of coverage varies significantly from state to state, and while some jurisdictions do provide extraterritorial coverage, not all do, and the extent can differ based on specific regulations. Additionally, benefits are not uniform and can differ widely among various state law jurisdictions, which goes against the